JESSM   |  e-ISSN: 2979-9899

Original article | Journal of Educational Studies in Science and Mathematics 2022, Vol. 1(1) 95-107

Critical Mathematics Education: A Dialogic Approach to Mathematics Education

Bulent Avci

pp. 95 - 107   |  DOI:   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2212-11-0001

Published online: December 29, 2022  |   Number of Views: 137  |  Number of Download: 638


This article aims to investigate the ways in which secondary mathematics can be taught through a dialogic pedagogy. It is part of Ph. D study which was a study of critical mathematics education oriented towards critical citizenship and democracy. The articles indicates that a dialogic teaching of mathematics is possible if it is integrated with collaborative learning and inquiry-based education.

Keywords: Critical Mathematics Education, Critical Pedagogy, Dialogic Pedagogy, Collaborative Learning, Communicative Rationality

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Avci, B. (2022). Critical Mathematics Education: A Dialogic Approach to Mathematics Education . Journal of Educational Studies in Science and Mathematics, 1(1), 95-107. doi: 10.29329/jessm.2022.498.5

Avci, B. (2022). Critical Mathematics Education: A Dialogic Approach to Mathematics Education . Journal of Educational Studies in Science and Mathematics, 1(1), pp. 95-107.

Chicago 16th edition
Avci, Bulent (2022). "Critical Mathematics Education: A Dialogic Approach to Mathematics Education ". Journal of Educational Studies in Science and Mathematics 1 (1):95-107. doi:10.29329/jessm.2022.498.5.

  1. Alexander, R. J. (2001). Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education. Oxford: Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander, R. J. (2005). Culture, dialogue and learning: Notes on an emerging pedagogy. Paper presented at the International Association for Cognitive Education and Psychology (IACEP), University of Durham, UK.  [Google Scholar]
  3. Alexander, R. J. (2006). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. Cambridge, UK: Dialogos. [Google Scholar]
  4. Alexander, R. J. (2015, May 10). Dialogic Teaching Essentials. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  5. Aloni, N. (2013). Empowering dialogues in humanistic education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(10), 1067-1081.  [Google Scholar]
  6. Avcı, B. (2017). Critical Mathematics Education in Neoliberal Era. (Ph.D.). Charles Sturt University, Australia. Retrieved from  [Google Scholar]
  7. Avcı, B. (2019). Critical Mathematics Education: Can Democratic Mathematics Education Survive under Neoliberal Regime? Boston, USA: Brill-Sense. [Google Scholar]
  8. Burbules, N. C. (1993). Dialogue in teaching: Theory and practice. New York: Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cesar, M. (1998). Social interactions and mathematics learning. Paper presented at the An International Conference :Mathematics Education and Society University of Nottingham, UK.  [Google Scholar]
  10. Darder, A. (2002). Reinventing Paulo Freire: A pedagogy of Love. Boulder, CO: Westview  [Google Scholar]
  11. Edwards-Groves, C., Anstey, M., & Bull, G. (2014). Classroom talk: Understanding dialogue, pedagogy and practice. Newtown, Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association Australia. [Google Scholar]
  12. Flecha, R. (2000). Sharing words: Theory and practice of dialogic learning. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  13. Freiberg, J., & Freebody, P. (1995). Analysing literacy events in classrooms and homes: Conversation-analytic approaches. Everyday literacy practices in and out of schools in low socio-economic urban communities, 1, 185-372.  [Google Scholar]
  14. Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the City. New York: Continuum. [Google Scholar]
  15. Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum. [Google Scholar]
  16. Freire, P. (2013). Education for critical consciousness. New York: Bloomsbury Academic. [Google Scholar]
  17. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (M. Thomas, Trans.  Vol. 1). Boston: Beacon. [Google Scholar]
  18. Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  19. hooks, B. (2003). Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kennedy, N. S. (2009). Towards a dialogical pedagogy: Some characteristics of a community of mathematical inquiry. Eurasia International Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 5(1), 71-78.  [Google Scholar]
  21. Kohn, A. (1992). No contest: The case against competition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. [Google Scholar]
  22. McLaren, P., & Kincheloe, J. L. (Eds.). (2007). Critical pedagogy: Where are we now? New York: Peter Lang. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press  [Google Scholar]
  24. Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms: McGraw-Hill International. [Google Scholar]
  25. Nicholas, B., & Bertram, B. (2001). Theory and research on teaching as dialogue. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 1102-1121). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. [Google Scholar]
  26. Nystrand, M. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar]
  27. Scott, P., Mortimer, E., & Aguiar, O. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90(4), 605-631.  [Google Scholar]
  28. Shor, I. (1987). Critical teaching and everyday life. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  29. Skovsmose, O., & Alrø, H. (2004). Dialogue and learning in mathematics education: Intention, reflection, critique (Vol. 29). New York: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  30. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]